We've had some great discussion about the track classifications and I hope that can continue (most of the good stuff is in the comments on the All Other link below), but I want to get back to the XC team rankings for this upcoming season. As you may remember, I want to make this year's rankings a joint effort between myself and the fans. So I need you all to post up your top teams in the state so that I can incorporate them into the ranking system.
Here are all of your cheat sheets. Feel free to group everybody as one or separate by classification. Let's get some discussion going and hopefully have an interesting set of lists.
District One
District Three
WPIAL
All Other (Includes 1 A)
The Running Diaries: John Trainor Foreward
John Trainor, July 2019
I’m
a pretty quiet guy by nature. Typically, I’ll sit back in a group of new
people, listen and react. But for whatever reason, when the situation presents
itself, I love to make speeches. I guess it’s because I think of myself as a
writer and as a story teller. Those are some of my only skills. So if I have
the chance to use them to make someone smile or to fight for someone’s rights,
I do it. And I’m excited about it.
That’s
how I ended up here. Shuffling nervously with my papers, preparing to present
my defense for the Bloomsburg Men’s Cross Country and Track and Field teams. We
were set to be dissolved, cut from the budget, and we were doing everything we
could to try and keep our squads on the books. Not much had worked so far and,
considering the slashes happening around us, things didn’t look particularly
promising for us Huskies.
I
suppose using the term “us” is a little misleading. I’m no longer a part of
Bloomsburg’s team. Or a member of the student body in general. I graduated in
May and, in all technical senses of the word, became an independent individual.
But, in this wacky sport, the line between team and individual is a little blurry.
I mean don’t get me wrong, I’m mortal enemies with all the other schools in the
PSAC and will hate them until the day I die. But if I see one of them out on a
run, I’ll give them a nod rather than a punch in the face. Unless it’s Ryan
Phillips. He’s the exception.
What
I’m trying to say is that, ultimately, runners are all a community. We are each
working toward the same goal: to be the best version of ourselves we can be.
Even if there’s animosity, there’s at least respect. Except, of course, Ryan Phillips.
Never Ryan Phillips.
So
even though this budget cut doesn’t affect me directly, I felt compelled to do
something for my future runners who would be following in my all too literal
footsteps. And so I spoke.
“Track
certainly has intrinsic value. It’s a really fun sport-most of the time anyway.
You go out every race and try to push your body to its absolute limits. There’s
no loop holes or short cuts. It’s just run fast. Jump high. Throw far. That’s
competition in its purest form.
“But
track’s greatest value is in the life lessons it teaches to its athletes. You
need to be dedicated. You need to be disciplined. You need to make sacrifices.
When someone offers you the chance to make a bad decision-anything from staying
out all night to taking illicit substances-it can give you another reason to
say no. It takes balance, time management and work ethic to achieve success. Therefore,
it’s not a surprise that our Cross Country and Track teams have the highest
GPAs in the entire school.”
I
felt like this was a good line to really hammer my point home. I took a moment
to let that line sit. One of the older members of my audience picked his nose. I
may have overestimated its value.
“A
lot of people complain that our generation is too entitled and expects
everything to just be handed to them without any work. Well, there’s no better
way to teach people about hard work than the sport of track and field. It takes
constant training-tireless labor-to excel. If you slack off, you will get beat.
Plain and simple.
“Socially
it can be critical as well. Again, what people say our generation is missing
can be found within cross country. When you go on a run with your teammates,
it’s just you guys out there. We can’t run with lap tops. There’s no texting
each other. It’s just you and your friends having a conversation. Learning.
Growing. Communication in its most simplistic and cherished form.”
Appealing
to the good old days. That was sure to get at least a nod of approval from
these baby boomers on the committee right? I looked over at the nose-picker. He
flicked his booger across the room. It could have been worse. At least he was
awake.
“Anyone
who has ever competed on a track or cross country team understands the unique
attitude of these runners. The sport naturally allows you to enjoy everyone’s
successes. Sure, there is a competitive fire to win and score points for your
team, but there is also a joy that comes from watching hard working teammates
set big personal bests. Or fighting with a rival and pushing each other under a
big time barrier for the first time.
“When
another team or athlete does well, we are happy for them. And the converse is
certainly true as well.”
So
there will the pillars. It seemed like maybe a few people were buying what I
was selling. But, overall, I suspect people’s minds were generally made up. I
suppose I shouldn’t have been surprised. Oh well, might as well bring it home.
“Just
to be clear, I’m not lobbying for other sports to be cut instead. All sports
have their place. My track is someone else’s tennis. Or golf. Or football. And
why would I want to take away their passion? But I do hope that fans of other
sports can see that my passion is the same as theirs. Even if my sport is more
boring or less mainstream, it doesn’t mean my love of the game is any less
important. That the lessons and skills that come out of my sport are any less
significant. Right now, athletes are fighting an uphill battle and we need everyone’s support.
“I
hope that we can all remember the pillars of track and field. Competition in
its purest form. Communication in its purest form. Humanity in its purest form.
And if that’s not worth saving, I’m not really sure what is.”
***
“So it turns out nothing’s worth saving.” The
boy to my left took a long swig of his beer. We each had our own coping
mechanisms. While he drank quickly from his glass, I sat staring absentmindedly
into my own, as if I could somehow find a couple thousand dollars to solve my
problem as long I searched diligently enough. Surprisingly, that’s not where
they’re hiding it.
Just
a few hours after my fervent defense of our cross country program, I posted up
at a local bar with my best friend and co-captain Gary Fox, mourning its demise.
Yes, I know it’s hard to believe, but a well-crafted think piece wasn’t enough
to change the hard line facts of an increasingly bankrupt state government or a
consistently underappreciated sport. Ok, so the word “underappreciated” may
have some bias to it, but if you thought I was going to play this perfectly
neutral, I haven’t sufficiently introduced myself.
“If
it makes you feel any better, I thought your speech was really good,” Gary said
comfortingly. The statement itself didn’t make me feel any better, but the
intent behind it helped a little bit. “Can you print me out a copy?” His direct
question forced me to speak for the first time since we sat down.
“Yeah.”
But
he was going to have to work harder than that to get a full sentence.
“Cool,”
he polished off his beverage and stood up from the table. “And you might as
well drink it, Train. Can’t get drunk with your eyes.” Nothing about my
behavior changed. He stared to walk away, but added “When I get back, I’m
buying you another one.”
I
hate it when he buys me drinks. Something about the principle of not letting
things go to waste makes me feel obligated to finish it-even when I don’t want
or need it. That’s how my twenty first birthday ended with a sobbing phone call
to my mother from the dormitory bathroom floor.
No,
I won’t be elaborating. I’ve already divulged too much.
After
a few short moments, someone slid back on the seat beside me. Figuring it was
Gary, I decided not to look up from my relatively untouched beverage.
“You
lose something in there?” It was a female voice, so I was pretty sure it wasn’t
Gary. Unless he had gotten way better at impersonations. I raised my head,
looking into the face of a pretty girl with brunette hair. By now I was at
least 99 percent sure this wasn’t Gary.
“No
… uh … I know it’s just beer in there,” I replied, my voice cracking slightly
from lack of use. I think it’s my clever wit that helped me win over so many
women during my collegiate years.
“Is
everything alright? I’m just guessing here, but something seems wrong.”
“Yeah
… it’s a long story.” I looked back over toward the bathroom, wondering how
quickly Gary might re-emerge. “I should probably tell you that my friend-”
“Oh,
I know,” she replied. “He’s over there talking to my friend.” She pointed to
another girl, about the same age, with red hair and freckles. She was indeed
talking to Gary. “To be perfectly honest, I’m just here to hold down the fort
until he gives her his number.” She added bluntly. Looking a little closer, her
friend did look a bit more recognizable. I think she was in my calculus class
or something. “So, you might as well tell me your long story.”
“Well,
if you’re gonna be stuck listening to me talk, I should probably get you a
drink.” I caught the eye of the bartender. That was about as smooth as I could
possibly hope to be.
“That’s
OK, I’ll pay for my own. I don’t want to lead you on or make it seem like I’m
interested in you.”
Super.
I took my first big swig from my cup. I needed it. She ordered a drink of her
own and then turned back to me. “So, let’s hear it.” I looked across the room
at Gary. He was smiling and laughing. I’m not super well versed in the bro
code, but I’d wager breaking that pair apart would violate it.
“Today
I spoke in front of some of Bloomsburg’s board members, trying to get them to
reconsider cutting the Men’s Cross Country and Track and Field teams. But they
didn’t.”
In
retrospect, it really wasn’t that long of a story.
“We
had a cross country skiing team here?” My new drinking mate asked, looking
astonished. “No wonder they decided to defund it. There’s been like no snow.”
“No,
Cross Country running.” I tried my
best to be civil, but it felt like her words had been a personal attack on my
family. “Have you never heard of that?”
“Nope.
What is it?”
“Have
you ever done, like, a local 5k race?” She nodded. “Well, it’s a lot like that.
Except instead of running on streets, you run across terrain. So hills, grass,
mud, things like that.”
“Oooh,
so it’s like a Spartan-”
“No,
it’s not a Spartan race. There’s no obstacles to climb or anything. It’s all
running based.”
“Do
they still spray you with colors?”
“No,”
I was becoming increasingly agitated, now starting to fidget in my chair. “It’s
not some gimmick driven event. It’s about racing head to head against the guy
next to you. Whoever is stronger and faster is gonna win. Simple as that.”
“Sounds
boring. But I don’t really like sports much.” She shrugged. I smiled weakly
before looking back over toward Gary. I was grateful to see he was heading back
this way. She noticed it too and, equally relieved, prepared for her exit.
“Well, nice meeting you, uh …”
“John,”
I filled in for her.
“Stacy.”
She lingered for another second before standing, “Good luck with your-well-your
not a Spartan race.”
“Thanks.”
I looked down to take another drink of beer. When I looked back up, Gary had
filled her vacated space, causing me to double take in confusion.
“She
seemed kinda cute. Did you get her-what’s got you in such a huff?” He changed
tone, noticing my disgruntled tearing at the paper on the outside of my bottle.
“Nothing,”
I replied, tossing a moist scrap onto the counter. “So, who were you talking
to?”
“This
girl Elizabeth. I tutored her last semester in like Calculus class or
something. She kept trying to get me to give her my number.” He finished
sourly.
“What’s
wrong with that? You like her, don’t you?”
“Not
really.”
“But
I saw you! You were smiling and laughing.”
“Nah
dude, I was giving you the signal! Didn’t you couldn’t tell that was the fake
laugh with the ‘save me’ eyes?”
“No.
Because that’s not a thing.”
“It’s
a thing.”
I
sighed and went back to picking apart my label. “So what did you do?”
“I
gave her my number.” Gary said flatly. “Not like I had much of a choice. She
had me cornered” He looked at me carefully. “I’m guessing your experience
didn’t go much better?”
“We
didn’t have a lot in common.”
“So
she hates running?”
“I
didn’t say that.”
“Well
it’s the only interest you have, so I figured it out.” I opened my mouth to
respond, but, admittedly, he had made a good point. “At least she got you to drink
half of your beer. That’s a positive.”
“Why
do people not get Cross Country?” I blurted out in frustration the question I
had been deliberating the whole night. “Like … nobody cares.”
“You’re just figuring this out?”
“No,
I guess not … But I just thought maybe, if I could teach people more about the
sport, get them to really understand what it’s about-”
“You’re
going about it the wrong way. The sport in and of itself, it’s fine, but what
makes it truly great is the people. The journey. The struggle. You can’t just make people understand that. They have
to experience it.” Gary reached over and grabbed the beer from my hands. “And
people aren’t exactly going to line up for that.” He tipped the bottle back and
chugged the rest of the drink before placing on the counter. “Now, c’mon let’s
get out of here.”
As
we walked away from the bar and toward the exit, we walked past the two girls
we had interacted with earlier that night. I gave a polite wave, but Gary
ushered me forward to make sure we didn’t get caught in another conversation.
While rushing forward, I noticed Gary’s ex-tutee’s shirt for the first time.
Printed across the front in orange text were the words “Vikings Field Hockey”.
Seeing them flash in front of me while dwelling on Gary’s last monologue, something
clicked in my mind.
“Gary,”
I reached out and grabbed his arm. “Did Elizabeth go to Union Valley High
School?”
“I
don’t know,” He said, continuing forward unperturbed, “Maybe That does sounds
vaguely familiar.” We exited the bar and trudged back up the road toward our
apartment, conveniently located just a few minutes away.
“I’m
gonna need you to call her.” I said decisively.
“You’re
kidding right? Didn’t we just over this?” Gary shook his head. “We move out
next month and then my goal is to never see her again.”
“This
is important. I’ve got an idea.”
“Unless
it’s as good as our DadHat YouTube series, I don’t care.”
We
continued our journey down the road before turning east onto a darker side
road. Although Gary said he didn’t care, I knew him better than that. His
curiosity would eventually cause him to break down and ask about my idea. It’d
probably take a couple days, maybe even a week, but in the end he’d-
“OK,
fine. What do you want?” Gary asked sounding defeated. Wow, he broke even quicker
than expected. With a rush of excitement, I turned to him and firmly relayed my
request.
“I
need you to help me get in contact with Jimmy Springer.”
Other Districts XC Returners Cheat Sheet
We’ve
taken care of the big three, so now let’s talk about the little guys. Lots of
talented programs in other districts who deserve a shout out, but I tried to
limit it to squads with top 5-10 potential in the state so that the post didn’t
get incredibly long. I apologize in advance if classifications or state
qualifying #s have been changed without me knowing. If they have, hit us up
with a link and I’ll be sure to update my files.
District 1
A
Jenkintown (1st D1, 6th
States)
Jack
Miller, Jr (2) 16:26/4:42
Josh
Jackson, Sr (3) 16:59/10:14/4:37
Pat
Wagner, Jr 17:49
Charlie
Mangan, Sr (9) 18:23/2:07
Eli
Kravinski, Sr (13) 18:53
Caleb Limmer, Sr 19:03
District
1 A really excelled last year at the state championships. They had two top 11
individual finishers and their team champs, Jenkintown, placed 6th
overall. This year, Jenkintown will look to duplicate the feat, returning their
top 2 medalists and a solid pack behind them. They can definitely be a top 5
team in the state this upcoming season, but they will need to improve the pack
and replenish the gap at the #3 spot left by the graduation of Jamail Kahn.
Meanwhile,
Dock Mennonite returns their entire top 5 including defending district champion
Tim Kennel. They will need to improve their back end depth if they are going to
compete with Jenkintown. At the very least, they should provide good motivation
for Jenkintown to keep focused this season. If things break right, they could
be the team heading to Hershey hoping to crack the top 5.
District 2
AAA
AAA
Abington Heights (1st
D2, 19th States)
Dan
Uhranowsky, Sr (3) 16:55/4:22/1:58
Kyle
Burke, Sr (1) 16:45/9:41/4:20
Ryan
Siebecker, Jr (11) 18:04/10:48
Adam
Traweek, Sr (18) 18:30
Ethan
Mattox, Jr (9) 18:00
Thomas
Kerrigan, Sr (17) 18:29
Stephen Haggerty, Jr 10:52
The
boys from Abington Heights are getting a nice bit of hype right now and they
deserve it. The often overlooked District 2 scene has produced its fair share
of medalists and top teams, including a 6th place squad back in
2010. Abington Heights returns their top 2 runners who are coming off terrific
track seasons and then bring back a good pack behind them. However, I’m not yet
convinced they are the best team in their own district – Wallenpaupack returns their
top 5 and could potentially add Tyler Wirth to the equation (based on literally
no evidence, I think we will see him on the trails this year). I’m a big fan of
the 1-2 punch for Abington Heights and honestly believe one of those top two
will finish as a state medalist in the fall (currently betting on Burke), but
this district will be no walkover. At least one of their 3-5 guys is going to
have to make a big step forward if this team wants to break into the top 10-12
in AAA.
AA
Dallas (1st D2, 1st
States)
Jack
Zardecki, Sr (2) 16:14/9:22
Josh
Wyandt, Sr (19) 16:53/10:23/4:37
Adam
Borton, Sr (13) 16:58/4:45/2:03
Mitchell
Rome, Jr (6) 16:43/10:01
Steven
Postupak, Jr (15) 17:18
Josh
Jarden, Sr (16) 17:20
There
will be plenty of time to talk about Dallas during the season. This is the
culmination of a three (arguably four) year run of excellence that could lead
to 3 straight titles. They bring basically everybody back (although shout out
to Jason Culp who was a critical piece of their success) and it seems like
everyone is on the rise after a strong track season. They still aren’t a lock
(York Suburban looks like they will be great again), but they are certainly the
favorites for a 3 peat.
Holy Reedemer (2nd D2,
10th States)
Bryce
Zapusek, Jr (7) 16:47/10:26
Lucas
Volpetti, Jr (9) 16:55/4:35
Scott
Williams, Sr (27) 17:48/4:46
Dominic
Capaci, Jr (23) 17:37/2:00
George
Strish, Jr (47) 18:31/10:47
Connor Stevens, Sr 18:30/10:31
Nick Pikul, So 18:44
I’m a
big fan of this Holy Redeemer squad. I think District 2 is the best individual
district in in AA and they return two guys who were top 10 last year, including
near state medal Bryce Zapusek. On the track, HR ran 8:02 in the 4x8 for 4th
at states with a relay that appeared to include both stand out sophomores Lucas
Volpetti and Dominic Capaci. Those three juniors should create a nice core to
go alongside Scott Williams. I expect this team to return to the state
championships for a second straight year. That being said, teams like
Tunkhannock (2013 state champs), Berwick (barely lost out on the last spot to Redeemer
last year) and Scranton Prep (a powerhouse) will be lurking.
A
Montrose (1st D2, 5th
States)
Brandon
Curely, Sr (2) 4:33/16:48/15:56 (3 Mile)
Max
Brewer, Jr (11) 17:49/10:38
Liam
Mead, Jr (8) 17:22/4:41/10:54
Jerome
Washo, Sr (10) 17:31
Eric Bixby, Jr 17:48
Colin Spellman, Jr 17:51
Nick Coy, So 18:18/10:41
I was
on the Montrose bandwagon big time last year. I honestly believed they could
have given Winchester Thurston a run for their money if they raced perfectly
and the title favorites faltered. However, Montrose had a couple missteps and
had to settle for a very closely fought 5th place finish. Still a
fantastic result, but perhaps leaving a sour taste in their mouth as they were
just 29 points out of the medals. This year, Montrose returns four guys from
that squad (although they lose perhaps their best two) who are hungry and
determined to improve on last season’s result. In a perfect scenario, Brewer
and Mead can step right into the spots their brothers graduated from and they
can pull from one of the deepest JV squads in A to reload the back part of
their varsity. I still these guys as contenders for team medals.
Elk Lake (2nd D2)
Cody
Oswald, Sr (5) 16:56/50.86
Peyton
Jones, Jr (6) 17:11/10:19
Brett
Carney, Sr (23) 18:14
Devin
Bennett, Jr (24) 19:05
Kale
Decker, Jr (39) 19:55
David Lamoreaux, Jr 19:12
Elk
Lake is an excellent program that has produced state championship level teams
year in and year out. But they get a tough draw against Montrose. With only one
spot up for grabs, Elk Lake is going to have to bring their “A” game to knock
off the defending champions. Cody Oswald and Peyton Jones are great (42nd
and 41st at states) and I think one of them could break out and
become a medalist. They have a solid pack behind them, but will need to be
better than solid to topple Montrose.
District 4
A
NE Bradford (1st D4, 4th
States)
Zak
Smith, Jr (6) 17:21
Nate
Mosier, Sr (10) 17:44/10:34
Aaron Boss,
Sr (34) 18:50/17:54 (3 Mile)
Tyler
Devonshire, Sr 18:30/17:29 (3 Mile)
Destine
Moore, Jr (15) 18:17/17:26 (3 Mile)
Dusty Cook, Jr 19:08
Northeast
Bradford has owned the A District 4 classification since it was created. In
2012 they won the team title and every year since they’ve been hovering around
the conversation. Last year, they took 4th overall with two state
medalists. Those medalists are gone as is #4 runner Austin Senn-Bishop, but
there are enough names still around to indicate Bradford will still be a tough
test. Zak Smith really came on strong at the end of last season and I like his
potential to jump into the top 25 this year. After that, it’s a strong group
with a nice pack. I’ve seen this team win with pack running and front running
before so it’s hard to doubt them, but they will need bring their “A” game to
stay ahead of the hungry team behind them.
Southern Columbia (2nd
D4)
Ethan
Knoebel, Jr (3) 16:25/4:27y/2:00
Nicholas
Kuzo, Sr (4) 17:29
Jacob
Petro, Jr (13) 17:30
Reese
Houseknecht, Jr (20) 17:42
Brady
Reese, So (23) 18:06/10:30
Eli
Yemzow, Sr (38) 19:15
Southern
Columbia is a great squad that, unfortunately, had to stay home last year
during state weekend. This squad had the potential to be a top 5 team last year
considering they bested Jenkintown, Cranberry, Elk Lake and Penns Valley at the
Foundation Invite. But a tough match up with NEB left most of the squad home
besides their excellent 1-2 punch of Ethan Knoebel and Nick Kuzo. Knoebel is
coming off a terrific track season and entering his junior year. That could
mean he becomes a superstar. Brady Reese, a rising sophomore with big talent,
is a name to watch as well. I think he could make a jump.
This
match up should be one of the most exciting of district week. Whichever teams
wins will be a must watch at states.
AA
Milton Area (1st D4, 14th
States)
Tyler
Leeser, Sr (2) 16:39/9:37/4:16/1:55
Seth
Kendall, Sr (4) 17:10/2:03
Kellan
Guinn-Bailey, Jr (9) 17:43/10:42
Tanner
Walter, So (27) 18:13/10:29
Nick
Doresky, Sr (18) 17:40/10:15
Colton
Aikey, Sr (32) 18:07
Noah
Stamm, Sr (58) 19:31
Colton Loreman, So 10:32
I like
this Milton squad. I think they got strong experience last year building
confidence on the Hershey course on two occasions. They ran the foundation meet
there in September and averaged 18:10 for 13th place. When they
returned in November, they finished 14th overall with an average of
18:02. That improvement curve was in line with state runner-ups York Suburban
and better than some of the other top 10 teams. Tyler Leeser has made the jump
from great to amazing in the past year and he will hopefully be an inspiration
and motivator for the guys behind him. Seth Kendall has the potential to be a
great #2 and really came on strong toward the end of the year. If he figures
out the Hershey hills this year, he could be a top 40 guy and really transform
this team.
Others:
Loyalsock (4th D10)
returns entire top 7 including Quinn Serfass (defending champ) and Ryan
Sullivan (multi-time state qualifier). Will potentially have 6 seniors in top
7, but will need to develop pack. Rising sophomore Alex Reed could be one to
watch. Warrior Run (6th D10)
returns entire top 7 including 3 freshman and 2 sophomores. Warrior Run also
had the top finisher in the Lewisburg Middle School Classic in Caden Dufrene.
On the track, they placed 8th in the state running 8:04 for the 4x8
last spring. You can never count Lewisburg
(2nd D10) although they lose a lot of firepower.
District 6
A
Penns Valley (1st D6, 9th
States)
Chris
Colwell, Sr (1) 16:41/10:11/4:42
Mark
Bierly, Sr (2) 16:58/10:23
Sam
Gray, Sr (6) 17:26/10:23/4:37
Charlie
Romig, Sr (15) 17:55
Haden
Stamm, Sr (26) 18:36
Everett
VanHeyst, Jr (85) 20:37
I’m
high on Penns Valley going into this year. It’s always tough to knock off the
traditional powerhouses at the top of the A standings, but Penns Valley has
been steadily climbing the latter towards elite status over the past three
seasons. They cracked the top 10 last year and even got a state medalist in
Chris Colwell. I think their top 3 is excellent, definitely good enough to be a
top 5 team in the state. The pressure will be on the #4 and especially #5 spot.
These guys are all seniors who have grown together and chased this dream. It
would be cool to see that journey end with some team medals.
Others:
Purchase Line returns their top two from a state qualifying team last year and
is coming off a track season that included an 8:03 run in the 4x800. Micah
Kurka and Alex Boring lead that squad along with rising sophomore Hunter
Antisdel. Kurka was 48th at states a year ago.
AA
Central Cambria (1st D6,
16th States)
Ohm
Vyas, Jr (4) 17:07/10:38
Nate
Kuntz, So (6) 17:08
Duncan
Lambie, Jr (8) 17:31
Tyler
Wilson, Sr (23) 17:11/10:26/4:43
Zach
Brandis, So (11) 16:57/10:39
Alex
Jeffers, Sr (18) 18:01
Ike Haycisak, So 18:25
Central
Cambria was a fascinating team prior to the state meet last year after
dominating the District 6 championships with a young core and a tight spread.
However, they had trouble translating that to the state finals and finished
just 16th. This year, they bring back almost everyone including two
rising sophomores and two rising juniors. They have 4 guys back who were top 11
in the district last year before even starting their junior season. I want to
see this pack in action before I jump though too far up my theoretical
rankings, but I’m confident this squad will continue to improve. Really, I’d
just like to see one of their guys break out and hit another level as a top 50
type individual. That will transform this unit into something special.
AAA
State College (1st D6, 7th
States)
Owen
Isham, Jr (3) 16:25/9:51
Sam
Horn, Sr (11) 17:40/10:29
Joe
Messner, Jr 17:45/10:48
Mitchell Etter, Sr 16:44/9:27/4:34
It’s
hard to underestimate State College. They were a top 5 team in the state in
2013 and, when they looked fairly average at times, came through with a clutch
run at states to take 7th last year. With 3 top 10 finishes in 4
years (with that non-top 10 finish at 11th), this team has proven
they are force to be reckoned with. But, they took a sizable hit to graduation
for a second straight season with 4 of their top 6 and two of their very good
top 3 coming off the board. Owen Isham and a healthy Mitchell Etter will fill
the front-running void quite nicely, but the pack will need to be strong if
State College is going to hold on to a top 10 team spot at states.
Mifflin County (2nd D6)
Chayce
Macknair, Jr (4) 16:41/9:33/4:23
Chase
Sheaffer, So (6) 16:59
Seth
Phillips, Jr (7) 16:55/1:55
Dylan
Unger, Sr (15) 17:43/10:35
Garren
Wolfgang, Sr (17) 17:07/1:59
State
College has emerged as the power in this district, taking the mantle from
Altoona. However, like all great dynasties, there is always a challenger
waiting to topple them. This year, it looks like it will be Mifflin County. MC
returns three sub 17 guys and two breakout stars in Chayce Macknair and Seth
Phillips. Those two both qualified for states individually on the track and
really impressed me. This squad is still on the younger side (top 3 are juniors
and a soph), but they can’t wait around for the chance to seize the district
title. The key will be seniors Unger and Wolfgang. If Wolfgang can become a
consistent sub 17 guy, I think Mifflin County is going to be special.
District 9
A
Elk County Catholic (1st
D9, 2nd States)
Ben
Hoffman, So 17:15/16:17 (3 Mile)/10:00/4:43
Matt
Dippold, Sr 17:20/16:13 (3 Mile)/9:53/4:38
Isaac
Wortman, So 17:20/16:18 (3 Mile)
Logan
Hoffman, Sr 16:56/15:49 (3 Mile)/10:26/4:40
Sam Wolfe, Sr 19:38/10:33
Jacob Carnovale, Jr 11:02/4:45
Elk
County Catholic held on over the final mile in a hotly contested battle for 2nd
in the state last year. Ultimately, it was a big move from their freshman Ben
Hoffman that helped them hold off 4x8 powerhouse Seneca. Now Hoffman will have
to make the jump from pack guy to potential #1 low stick as Zach Wortman graduates.
The rest of the team’s scoring 5 will return and has the potential to be really
good yet again. Maybe even state championship level good. I think each member
of their top 4 has the chance to be a medalist by seasons end. Logan Hoffman
has run 15:49 for 3 miles and was 28th at 2 miles at last year’s
championships. He is their #4 returner. This team just needs to develop a #5
who can deliver them a strong performance and keep their score from blowing up.
They have a couple interesting JV guys in Sam Wolfe and Jacob Carnovale who could
be names to watch this season. I’m very high on this team for 2017.
Smethport (3rd D9)
Christian
Tanner, Jr (5) 16:49/15:59 (3 Mile)/4:36/2:01
Darion
Gregory, Jr (6) 17:14/10:12/4:46/16:25 (3 Mile)
Eric
Szarowicz, Jr (43) 18:58
Ethan
Nannen, So (48) 19:05/18:03 (3 Mile)
Smethport
is a fun team. They are very young with a projected top four that includes only
rising juniors and a sophomore, but they have two outstanding front runners in
Tanner and Gregory. Those guys will be the 2 to beat at Districts next year as
the top names graduate. Can this squad develop the back end of their line-up
enough to hold off Kane and Cranberry. If they do, they could have a very
similar finish to Cranberry’s 2016 team that took 8th in A.
Others:
Kane returns their entire top 6 from last year’s championships. They will need
to establish a front runner (their top guy, Shaw, was just 19th
overall last year), but they have a couple seniors and some young guns with
potential to improve. Kane was 4th overall last year and will be
hoping to plunge into that top 2 in this strong district.
AA
Punxsutawney (1st D9, 17th
States)
Owen
Bartlebaugh, So (2) 17:44/10:36/4:48
Ethan
Brentham, Jr (1) 17:36/10:21/4:47
Corbin
Heitzenrater, So (11) 18:55
Liam
Storms, Sr (15) 19:17
Ethan
May, Jr (20) 19:23/11:16
Matt Wehrle, Sr 1:59/4:51
Bradford (2nd D9)
Vinnie
Bizzarro, Jr (4) 17:06/2:04
Cade
Hayden, Sr (5) 17:26/10:51
Logan
Caruso, Sr (6) 16:55/9:52/4:29
Andrew
Kraft, So (7) 17:53/10:48
J.
Daniel Fedak, Jr (14) 18:53/17:48 (3 Mile)
David
Allen, Jr (17) 19:36/18:14 (3 Mile)
Dominic Cary, So 19:30
Tyler Kraft, So 2:06
The
District 9 AA battle should come down to two very familiar teams. Punxsutawney
enters as the defending champions. They are led by individual champ Ethan
Brentham and break out freshman performer Owen Bartlebaugh. Those two make for
a terrific 1-2 punch. After that, the pack will need to continue to progress,
but the pieces are there. It will be interesting to see if Matt Wehrle, who ran
1:59 last spring, comes out for the XC team and gives them a lift in their
scoring 5.
Punxsutawney’s
old rival Bradford will be ready for the challenge. They took 4th
through 7th last year with three returners. They return their entire
top 7 and are hungry to reclaim the district title. You have to like this pack
and you certainly have to be excited about the prospect of two time XC district
champ Logan Caruso returning to full health. He started to hit his stride
toward the end of outdoors and could be a real challenge for the Groundhogs’
top 2.
District 10
AA
Harbor Creek (1st D10, 4th
States)
Ryan
Stravaggi, Jr (2) 16:23/4:26
Aiden
Weber, Jr (3) 16:26/10:03
Christian
Babo, Sr (8) 16:37
Nolan
Weber, So (38) 18:13
Nate
Dougan, Sr (70) 17:48/10:37
Caleb Mandel, Jr 18:14/4:49
Harbor
Creek was an incredibly interesting team last year. They have 3 state medalists
and 4 top 50 finishers, a truly elite group of runners. However, they had to
settle for 4th at states as they ran into some terrific teams at the
front end and were edged out via the #5 spot against others. It could
potentially be a similar story this year for the district champs. They return
all 3 of those medalists (two of which were sophomores) and have a crop of
potential talents to give them a lift on the back end of the scorers. I think
Noal Weber could be quite strong this year. He was 38th in the
loaded D10 as just a freshman and helped the team clinch their District 10 with
his performance. He should really benefit from an extra year of training and
experience, especially on those Hershey hills.
I think
this team has all the pieces to contend for the top 5 again. They may even be
better in 2017 then they were in 2016. However, they are peaking at the wrong
time. District 10 AA is absolutely loaded as a ton of teams return a lot of
talent. And then forecasting ahead to states, essentially all the top programs
return 4 or 5 guys who are doing incredible running. Let’s see how Harbor Creek
handles the pressure of repeating their championship efforts.
General McLane (2nd D10,
6th States)
Erik
Andrzejewski, Jr (4) 16:56/9:41/4:31
Nate
Price, Jr (6) 16:43/9:38/4:28
Simon
Zehr, Jr (23) 17:46
Nick
Halmi, Jr (60) 17:56
Gotta
say, General McLane made me a fan last year. They did some clutch running, took
down some big scalps and ended up going on to take 6th at states.
Their top two, Erik Andrzejewski and Nate Price, are rising juniors with a ton
of talent. I think these two have a ton of potential (they are just stuck in a
loaded class that also includes the Harbor Creek 1-2 and Jonah Powell … and
that’s just in their district). If General McLane wants to repeat their incredible
stretch run in 2017, they will need to find guys behind those 2 that can make
an impact. Two other rising juniors in Simon Zehr and Nick Halmi will be tasked
with the job.
Grove City (3rd D10)
Tyler
Quinn, Sr (15) 17:34
Jonah
Powell, Jr (17) 16:14/4:22/9:49/2:00
Mason
Murray, So (21) 17:50
Luke
Owrey, Jr (25) 17:34/10:04/4:45
Joe Somora, So 17:58
Ben Jones, Sr 4:41/10:19/18:30
Grove
City is a terrific program with a long history of success. But last year the
powerhouse was stunned in the District qualifiers, taking 3rd place
behind General McLane and having to stay home from the state championships. The
good news? The top 4 guys at districts were all returners and pretty much all
had strong days for themselves at districts. Jonah Powell is a star and
although he had a hiccup last year, should be back with a vengeance this
season. It wouldn’t surprise me if he’s the individual district and state
champion this fall considering his progress on the track and his XC credentials
to date. I also like some of their up and coming talent. Luke Owrey looked very
strong as a sophomore last year and Ben Jones showed consistent improvement
during the spring. I’m expecting this team to rally together a redemption squad
and get back to states where they have been 5th, 2nd, 5th
and 2nd in the years before last.
Fairview (4th D10)
Jamison
Cook, Jr (12) 16:54
Jerrod
Nelson, Sr (13) 17:32/10:14/4:48
Cole
Pollock, Sr (33) 17:58
Max
Myers, Jr (36) 18:32
Jacob
Shultz, Sr (37) 18:28
Wes
Good, Jr (55) 19:01
Tim
Kill, Jr (77) 18:38
I
wanted to give Fairview a quick shout out. They’ve got a lot of talent coming
back, a strong pack and a potential breakout star or two out front. They will
have some work to do if they are going to catch any of the schools in the top
3, but we saw an upset last year so I don’t think we should count them out. If
they do advance, I think we have seen enough evidence the past few years that the
top schools in District 10 are top 10 teams in the state, knocking on the door
of top 5 if they peak right.
A
Seneca (1st D10, 3rd
States)
Robert
Stepnowski, Sr (20) 17:46/10:35
Jake
Schneider, Jr (29) 17:36/2:03
Brock
Smith, So (36) 17:46/10:30
Nick
Post, Sr (31) 17:38/10:31
Alex Hopson, So 19:09
Matt Zajac, So 19:16
Seneca
has cemented themselves as a top 10 program in the state over the past 4
seasons. Of course, that was in large part thanks to the now graduated Myers
twins who have been elite athletes since their arrival at the school. With
Myers, Myers and Hanes out the door, it’s finally time for the next generation
to rise to the occasion and try and keep Seneca’s title in house. It won’t be
easy, but they return a crop of four guys who seem poised to carry on the legacy.
Schneider likely learned a lot from his training with the 4x8 crew this past
spring and is coming off a pretty nice season for himself. Stepnowski, rising
sophomore Brock Smith and Nick Post all have personal bests that indicate they
can be top 15-20 guys in the district this fall. But is that enough? D10 A has
consistently produced top 10 teams and has had individual title contenders as
well. I’d say Seneca is still among the favorites, but it’s going to be crowded
at the top.
Reynolds (5th D10)
Troy
Hart, So (16) 17:33/10:21
Dylan
Forrester, Sr (24) 16:59/2:03
Garrett
Duffy, Sr (32) 18:27
Corey
Thompson, Sr (39) 18:29
Adam
Wilcox, So (66) 18:36
Nick
Gill, Sr (106) 18:58
This
Reynolds team was very solid last year and return their core for ‘17. Troy Hart
was terrific as a freshman last year. I think Dylan Forrester could be a top 10
guy this season as well. They are built a lot like Seneca with a nice pack and some
strong potential, but they will need to be better than that if they want a
state spot. Watch for Adam Wilcox this year as a sleeper to emerge as a key piece
for this squad.
Lakeview (9th D10)
Zac
Tingley, Sr (4) 16:33/10:17/1:59
Carson
Kyko, So (51) 18:45
Tyler
Lightcap, Sr (57) 19:28
Logan
Hogue, Jr (63) 17:48/10:29
Joe
Grim, Jr (65) 18:54
Zac
Tingley is an excellent runner who has program changing potential. When you
have a guy of his caliber leading the way and inspiring his teammates, that can
left your school to the next level. He will provide the low stick potential and
the rest of this top 5 will just need to fill in the pieces, racing with
essentially a man advantage. The pack will have to get better (they were just 9th
last year), but I think they definitely can. Keep an eye on Logan Hogue who I
think may end up being one of the best #2 runners in the district.
Others:
Cochranton (7th D10)
returns their entire top 7 including last year’s 8th place finisher
Noah Bernarding. What makes this team a must watch is the fact that their
returners are all either rising sophomores or rising juniors. That could mean
this team has big upside. Even with that young core, Cochranton had 4 guys
under 17:45 at Sharpsville last fall. West
Middlesex (2nd D10, 7th States) was a big surprise to
me last year when they made states over established powers Mercyhurst and North
East. They return a talented big three in Luke Mantzell and the Chlpka boys who
will be sophomores and juniors respectively in 2017. Those are their only
varsity returners, but they have some younger pieces like Joey Varga who could
potentially add another dimension to their line up.
Freshman
will likely play a big role in this district (and others). Keep in mind that
West Middlesex got a huge boost from their freshman in Mantzell, who they
needed to get to states. We can’t predict which freshmen will show up in 2017
(for the most part) so there’s still a lot up in the air, even for the best
programs. D10 A should be a wild ride this year.
District 11
AA
Notre Dame GP (1st
Districts, 9th States)
John
Koons, Jr (2) 17:02/16:04 3 Mile
Anthony
Pacchioli, Sr (6) 17:05
Charlie
Hohl, Sr (17) 17:49/51.51
Sheamus
Hammerstone, Sr (13) 17:14/10:16/4:40
Aeron
Meilinger, Sr (46) 18:38/17:16 3 Mile
Joe
Gubernot, Jr (49) 18:46/11:18
Notre
Dame Green Pond had a nice day at states. Their #1 runner, sophomore John
Koons, took 25th overall and earned a state medal. Then, thanks to a
nice team run, NDGP finished 9th overall in the team standings.
Considering they bring back 6 varsity runners (including 4 top 20 finishers
from districts), it’s hard not to see them as a potential top 5 team in the state.
The x-factor here could be Sheamus Hammerstone. When I look at a team, I
usually jump to their top 3 first and Hammerstone could be a great #3 for this
school. Another interesting piece is Charlie Hohl who was a 400 meter runner
during track but had one of his best races of the year at states on the Hershey
hills. It’s a talented bunch.
AAA
Parkland (1st D11, 17th
States)
Nicholas
Bower, Jr (12) 16:37/9:54
Sam
Morgan, Sr (3) 16:31/4:21/2:00
Riley
Williamson, Jr (8) 1:59/4:33/16:47
Jacob
Ringer, Sr (27) 17:18/1:58
Nathan Rode, Sr 17:28/10:15
Parkland
knows how to make it to states. They know how to compete for district titles.
And so far, they’ve developed a nice group of talent to try and continue their
streak of excellence. Sam Morgan, the 3rd place finisher and top
returner from districts, is an experienced winner who can lead this squad from the
front. Nicholas Bower made big steps in 2016 and broke 10 minutes on the track.
Riley Williamson and Jacob Ringer are both sub 2 guys. And we know this team is
deep. They tend to show up with an army to XC meets. And yet, in a rare turn,
Parkland doesn’t have favorite status for this year’s district championship. Let’s
see if they run with a chip on their shoulder this fall.
Southern Lehigh (2nd
D11, 18th States)
Colin
Cramer, Sr (17) 17:00/9:33/4:36
Raahi
Klar-Chaudhari, Sr (16) 16:58/10:29
Thomas
Matsumura, Sr (7) 16:44/9:39/4:23
Corey
Welsh, Jr (9) 16:47/10:01/4:44
Alex
Fillman, Jr (36) 17:55/2:03
Southern
Lehigh has emerged as a potential top 10 team in the state. They absolutely
stunned me at districts last year with a really impressive bit of pack running.
Since then, they’ve continued to put on a show with strong results from Colin
Cramer and Thomas Matsumura on the track. That 1-2 punch makes this team
dangerous on not just the district level, but also the state level. Lehigh
reminds me a bit of the Freedom teams that rose up in District 11 in recent
years, riding a nice pack with some talented individuals to a position where
they could challenge the best in district and contend for a top 10 spot.
Hopefully everyone stays healthy and continues to improve.
District 12
A
Masterman (1st D12, 15th
States)
Dan
Bici, Sr (2) 17:36/10:01/4:30
Stephen
Njiru, Jr (5) 18:53/10:30
Isaac
Colon, Sr 19:05/10:28
Noah
Bradley, So (11) 19:15
Darren
Chen, Sr (9) 19:24
David
Lawrence, Sr (4) 18:58/4:55
Masterman
is typically dominant on the D12 A stage and with a group of 6 coming back from
their state line up, it seems likely they will take gold yet again. But the
bigger goal for this squad should be to contend on a state level. Their top 3
is coming along well as Bici had a monster track season while Nijiru and Colon
impressed me as well. David Lawerence was a top 4 guy in the district last year
so he can clearly be a contributor on a good team. That’s plenty of pieces for
Masterman to make a run and get back into the top 10 teams in the state.
AAA
LaSalle (1st D12, 5th
States)
Vincent
Twomey, So (7) 16:59/4:29
Ethan
Maher, So (15) 17:18/10:09
Evan
Addison, Sr (1) 16:18/4:17y/1:54/9:24/8:46
Sean Egan, Sr 17:38/9:50
Jack Seiberlich, Jr 18:04/4:35y
Matthew Zilligen, Jr 18:00/4:28y
O’Hara (2nd D12, 13th
States)
Jack
Becker, Sr (12) 16:51/10:04
Tom
McNicholas, Sr (27) 17:43/10:09
Josh Hayes, Jr 17:55
Derek Sacks, Sr 18:04/4:48y
LaSalle
and O’Hara could be on this list even if you didn’t know any of their
returners. The coaching and the sustained excellence have given them the
benefit of the doubt. However, both teams will be fighting up-hill battles in
2017. LaSalle lost a ton of seniors including consistent varsity performers
like Brendan Price and Stephen Paul. In fact, their only two returners from the
5k at states are rising sophomores. However, they have Evan Addison, defending
district champion, to lead the charge and provide a low stick while up and
comers Matthew Zilligen and Jack Seiberlich could factor into the varsity
equation. LaSalle was pretty darn deep last year and even if most of their core
are gone, I trust them to restock.
O’Hara
has been one of the best teams in the state for almost a decade, but this year
could finally be the one where they take a step back. They graduated arguably
their best four runners from 2016 and are running out of links to the O’Hara
squads that posted 5 straight top 3 finishes at states from 2010 to 2014. Jack
Becker had a strong season last year when he got the chance to be a consistent
part of the varsity squad and I like the track season McNicholas put together.
But they will need some JV guys to step up like others have before them and
make mini leaps to get toward elite status. On this team, it seems very
possible. We’ve seen guys like Rob Morro and Gavin Inglis make big leaps to
become top 30 types at states and O’Hara has posted 22 top 50 finishers at
states since joining the PIAA in 2008 (21 of those have come since 2010) and 14
top 25 finishers (all since 2010). Let’s see if they can build on their legacy
and surprise me with a huge 2017 season and a return to the state’s top 10.
District 3 XC Returners Cheat Sheet
With
the District One and District Seven Cheat Sheets already in the books, let’s
take a look at your District 3 edition. As a reminder, these are not rankings.
It’s just a sheet to remind everyone what some key teams return and give some
preliminary thoughts. This is to help each of you come up with your own
rankings for the 51-49 team rankings that we will hopefully be throwing together
as a team at the end of this month!
AAA
Carlisle (2016: 1st,
2015: 3rd)
Jack
Wisner, Jr: 16:24 (24), 1:56/4:24y/10:08
Bryce
Dunkelberger, Jr: 17:17 (71), 17:15/10:23
Caleb
Padgett, Jr: 17:32 (107)
Jacob Morris, Jr: 10:24/17:36
Caleb Van Grouw, Jr: 17:41
Trent Balestri, Jr: 10:11/18:10
Casey Padgett, So: 10:02/19:33
Carlisle
was a good team before the Affolders came along, and they will continue to be a
good team after they have left. However, it’s an uphill battle for the Herd
after losing varsity scorers like Kole and Fiorentino in addition to the
Affolders this June. Considering this team wasn’t, on paper, incredibly deep
during XC, one might think these guys are in danger of slipping out of the state
qualifying picture. However, they return a strong front running presence in
Jack Wisner and a ton of juniors right alongside him. They have a really nice
crew of guys in the 10:00-10:20 range for 3200 with a number of potential
breakout stars who are making the sophomore to junior jump (or freshman to
sophomore jump for Casey Padgett). This team has a chance to make a nice run in
2017 and perhaps be back in title contention by 2018.
Lower Dauphin (2016: 2nd,
2015: 9th)
Jared
Giannascoli, Sr: 16:04 (8), 15:52/2:01/4:28
Mark
Walsh, So: 16:30 (29), 9:59/4:32
Josiah
Helmer, Jr: 17:28 (97), 10:04/17:26
Miles Book, Jr: 18:01/4:51
Hunter Lohmann, So: 18:19
Steven Schankweiler, Sr: 2:00/4:30
Like
Carlisle a year ago, Lower Dauphin got a big left from a great top 3. While
they don’t graduate everyone from that core, losing Kyler Shea and Colton
Cassel is a big hit to this team’s foundation. They have been consistent low
sticks since their sophomore year. So now this team needs to find a way to replenish
their front running while continuing to build up their depth. My guess is Mark
Walsh breaks out big time. I could see this guy challenging the 16 minute
barrier and competing for a top 50 spot at states as he works with Giannascoli.
But after that, they need some guys to step up. Helmer is experienced and has
run some nice marks, but a newcomer will have to emerge from off the radar if
this team is going to stay in the state qualifying picture.
Mechanicsburg (2016: 3rd,
2015: 12th)
Morgan
Cupp, Sr: 15:50 (5), 15:36/9:32/4:23
Brandan
Knepper, Jr: 16:36 (32), 9:53
Michael
Vigliano, Jr: 17:33 (109), 16:33/4:41
Shay
Rounsville, Sr: 17:48 (129), 17:41/2:02
Enoch
Marzano, So: 18:23 (193), 18:17
Julian Bosley, Jr: 18:16
Alex Knepper, So: 18:26
Mechanicsburg
was one of the pleasant surprises of last season. I was super high on them coming
in and this upset special came through at Big Spring, punching a ticket to
states with a 3rd place finish. Two of the key pieces to that
magical run are gone as Alex Tomasko and Andrew Sulon graduate, but they do
have a low stick in Morgan Cupp and a top sleeper pick in Brandan Knepper.
Knepper was absolutely killing it toward the end of the season and was a top 80
or so runner in AAA at states. As just a sophomore. Michael Vigliano has also
shown flashes of brilliance with a 16:33 PR from Carlisle last year. That’s a
nice top 3 if everything comes together, but will they have the depth needed to
contend with some of these powerhouse programs. Like many teams at this stage
in the game, that’s where the question marks are.
Manheim Central (2016: 4th,
2015: N/A, less than 5 finishers)
David
Merkey, Sr: 16;51 (45), 16:36
Carson
Hepner, Jr: 17:13 (65), 10:21
Connor
Sylvester, So: 18:16 (178)
Isaac Martin, So: 19:00
Luke Weaver, So: 19:19
If
Mechanicsburg was a surprise, we need to invent a new word to describe Manheim
Central’s rise through the ranks. After not even scoring 5 runners at districts
in 2015, MC took home the 4th and final state qualifying spot over
powerhouses like Cumberland Valley, Hershey and Hempfield. But they took a huge
hit to their front running with 3 of their big 4 graduating. David Merkey is a
solid runner (and a clutch performer), but he’s going to need some help this
year if Manheim Central wants to repeat their successes of a year ago. The
spotlight will shine on three rising sophomores with a lot of potential to grow
in this on the rise program.
Cumberland Valley (2016: 5th,
2015: 2nd)
Andrew
Brown, Sr: 16:41 (35), 16:15/9:57/4:27
Devon
Heisler, Sr: 17:00 (55), 16:45/10:14
Bennett
Brown, Sr: 17:21 (79), 17:16/10:14
Caleb Schultz, Sr: 16:49/1:58/4:41
Nick DeMario, Jr: 16:58
Jesse St. Cyr, So: 17:27/10:41
Matt Todd, Jr: 17:30
Even in
a season where it seemed bad luck was being tossed on them at every turn,
Cumberland Valley still finished the season just 2 points away from a state
qualifying appearance. They lose some strong pieces to graduation, including
some 16 guys Soliman and Higgins, but they return a deep core of sub 17
runners. Andrew Brown is a terrific runner who has emerged as a top runner in
D3 while CV has a nice pack of options to slot in behind him. I expect this
school to contend not just for a state qualifying spot this year, but also a district
title.
Hershey (2016: 7th,
2015: 6th)
Andrew
Sullivan, Sr: 16:12 (11), 4:21/9:35/15:52
Mike
Morris, Jr: 16:20 (21)
Casey
Sisco, Sr: 17:05 (58), 16:59/10:35
Raphael
Abadilla, Sr: 17:25 (92), 16:32/10:13
Gavazzi
Patrick, Jr: 18:02 (156), 17:29
Ethan Rogers, So: 17:26/10:31
Luke Sheppard, So: 4:48
Hershey
has been knocking on the door of a state qualifying birth the past few seasons,
but has not quite been able to put it together at the district meet when the
pressure is on. That’s been the story for plenty of other teams in the past and
plenty of those other teams ended up pulling through and punching that ticket
before all was said and done. This could be the year for Hershey as their top 2
is as good as anybody’s with Andrew Sullivan and Mike Morris ready to lead the
way. They also return multiple other sub 17 guys with a couple young sophomores
in Rogers and Sheppard who could make noise. Things are looking fairly wide
open in District 3 this year. Although it’s very crowded with great teams, few
have emerged as truly elite. Hershey could be one of the breakout squads this
season if everything clicks.
Hempfield (2016: 8th,
2015: 1st)
Christian
Groff, Sr: 16:18 (17), 15:54/4:26
Max
Lessans, Sr: 16:30 (30), 16:26/10:02
Ryan
Farmer, Sr: 17:09 (63), 16:54/10:07
Justin Rittenhouse, Jr: 17:25
Grayson Dague, So: 17:49
Hempfield
won district titles in 2014 and 2015 but was stunned out of the state
qualifying picture during a wild 2016 championships. Despite that fact, the top
tier program still qualified 3 individuals for the state championships, two of
which are returning this fall. Christian Groff and Max Lessans join Ryan Farmer
as sub 17 returners. However, Hempfield lost a good chunk of their elite depth
to graduation in 2017. That means some JV runners like Justin Rittenhouse will
need to step up into the starting five. This is a great program that peaks well
and runs clutch. I’m excited to see how they cultivate the back half of their
varsity squad as they look for redemption at districts.
Twin Valley (2016: 9th,
2015: 5th)
Chase
Knorr, Sr: 16:33 (31), 9:56/4:37
Garrett
Knorr, Sr: 16:55 (50), 16:37/10:01/4:39
Griffin
Schlegel, So: 16:57 (51), 16:29/10:06
Dylan
Servis, Jr: 17:08 (62), 16:34/10:18/4:42i
Trey
Hill, Jr: 18:18 (183), 17:18/4:40/2:02i
Nick Mandis, So: 18:18
Jacob Reyher, So: 17:46
Definitely
the most intriguing team on the list. Twin Valley is an excellent program that
qualified for states in 2013 and 2014. After graduating all of their core, TV
almost made it back to states in 2015, taking 5th. What’s been wild
about this team is that, despite rarely having an elite front runner, the pack
has always lifted this team to excellent results. This year is expected to be
now different as they quietly return 4 sub 17 minute runners, a pack of
4:40/10:20 types and some young guys with room to grow. Don’t sleep on Twin
Valley to make a run this year.
Some
quick hits:
Manheim Township
Evan
Dorenkamp, Jr: 16:22/4:23y/1:58
Tim
Antonacci, Sr: 17:24/10:32
Josh
Long, Sr: 17:30
Jarrid
McKenzie, Sr: 18:05
Riley
Horton, So: 18:18
Gavin Maurer, Sr – 2:01/4:51
Ian Miller, Jr – 4:35/9:44
If
Manheim Township can get Ian Miller on the cross country alongside Evan
Dorenkamp, this squad will have a very formidable 1-2 punch. They return a lot
of key cogs, but they were outside the top 20 overall teams in 2016. I like
this team and their sleeper potential, but they won’t start the season super
high in any preseason polls.
Cedar Crest
Adam
Wolfe, Sr 16:32/10:08
Jake
Barrett, Jr 9:53/16:54
Will
Sheffield, So 16:59
Josh
Rudd, Sr 10:10/17:10
Noah
Bragunier, Sr 17:05/10:25
The
always dangerous Cedar Crest squad loses their top dog in Jesse Cruise, but
returns 3 sub 17 runners behind him. Jake Barrett had an excellent track
season, clocking a 9:53 for 33200 and rising sophomore Will Sheffield is yet
another member of the class of 2020 with big upside.
Wilson (4th in 2015, 6th
in 2016) is always lurking as a state qualifying contender, but they’ve lost a
good chunk of their front running behind super star Jake Underwood. Cocalico returns a nice core of young
talent and should add back in Kreider (4:29/9:50/16:39) to the equation in
2017. He’s a real game changing presence from not just a points perspective,
but also a training perspective.
AA
York Suburban (2016: 1st,
2015: 1st)
Bryce
Ohl, Sr: 16:40 (2), 4:33
Jarrett
Raudenski, Jr: 16:40 (3), 4:41/2:00
Josh
Kerr, Sr: 17:01 (11), 10:31
Tanner
Haynes, Sr: 17:02 (13), 4:42
Scott
Curry, Sr: 17:26 (24), 10:32
Andrew
Paskey, Jr: 18:00 (49)
There’s
not much to say here. York Suburban has won the district title in impressive
fashion each of the past three seasons. They’ve been state title contenders,
produced state medalists and have been close to unstoppable when everything is
clicking. This year should be no different with essentially everyone back from
their district title team. It’s about state gold rather than district gold for
these guys. They didn’t make huge waves on the track, but that typically hasn’t
been their style. The key to making the leap could be Jarrett Raudenski. If he
becomes a top 10 guy as a junior like Ohl did last year, Dallas will have their
hands full.
Wyomissing (2016: 2nd,
2015: 7th)
Joe
Cullen, Sr: 16:35 (1), 1:53/4:13/16:30/9:33
Ben
Kuhn, So: 17:18 (20), 9:55/4:38
Ryan
Vargo, Jr: 17:37 (30)
Josh
Diehl, Jr: 17:54 (45)
Thomas
Foster, So: 18:13 (58)
Austin
Keim, Sr: 19:32 (129)
Matt Driben, Sr – 17:10/9:53
Wyomissing
has been another excellent program, although they’ve seen their biggest gains
on the track. In 2015, they had the individual district champ and another state
qualifier in Cullen, but finished just 7th with only 5 runners
completing the course. This year, it looks like Wyomissing could finally have the
depth they need to move from solid district contender to state powerhouse.
Cullen is back and obviously an elite talent. They return two sub 10 3200
runners in Kuhn and Driben and then have two more sub 18 guys coming back in
Vargo and Diehl. Hard not to like this team’s chances of returning to states.
Now, it’s just a matter of how they do when they get there.
Milton Hershey (2016: 3rd,
2015: 5th)
Rafael
Mendez, Sr: 17:01 (12), 4:40/16:53
Luis
Guyton-Acevedo, Sr: 17:06 (15)
Jake
Edwards, Sr: 17:27 (25), 10:46
Gary
Waters, Jr: 18:14 (59), 17:33
Andrew
Brammer, So: 18:36 (81), 18:11
Jonas Mendez, So: 11:03
Milton
Hershey consistently surprises me as a distance program. I expect the sprint
success (and they’ve had a ton of that), but this XC program has now produced
two top 5 finishes in back to back years. They’ve also absolutely crushed the
4x8 on the track. Hershey returns their top 4 runners from a year ago and seems
like a good bet to get back to states. There are some sneaky good teams behind
them, but for now it appears the top 3 from a year ago are the favorites to
hold their ground.
Trinity (2016: 4th,
2015: 2nd)
Will Bucher,
Jr: 17:13 (16), 17:01/4:40
Sam
Predmore, Jr: 18:26 (72), 17:52/10:55
Jason Rittman, So: 19:00
Trinity
gets a mention as they are always a strong program. They were a surprising 4th
last year given their historically excellent performances, but they got some vengeance
on the track with an eye-popping 4x800. Losing Matt Geisler will hurt on the
track and on the trails, but Will Bucher has grown a lot in the past few
seasons under his tutelage. He and Sam Predmore are the only returners from
this varsity squad, but those are two strong leaders that could help instill a
sense of drive into the next generation at Trinity.
Big Spring (2016: 7th,
2015: 23rd)
Ishmael
Kirkwood, Jr: 17:34 (28), 17:31
Connor
Greene, Sr: 18:01 (50), 17:58
Jackson
Penner, Sr: 18:23 (68)
Ian
Ward, So: 18:29 (75), 4:56
Dain
Vallie, Jr: 18:31 (78), 18:28
Brennan
Flory, Sr: 18:57 (102)
Hunter Rickrode, So: 18:33
Big
Spring gets a shout out for going for 23rd to 7th in the
standings last year. That’s a huge jump and a big breakthrough for that
program. They get a second shout out for bring back all the key pieces of that
squad, including borderline state qualifier Ish Kirkwood. Lastly, you have to
appreciate the fact that these guys will have home course advantage at
Districts. Could they be the surprise team to break up the top 3 from 2016?
Quick
Hits:
Hamburg (2016: 10th,
2015: N/A, less than 5 finishers)
Wyatt
Conrad, Sr: 16:59 (9), 10:07
Levi
Hayle, Jr: 17:13 (18), 10:09
Seth
Boyce, Sr: 17:40 (33), 4:33/10:30
Josh
Schreiner, Jr: 19:06 (107)
They
return a potentially awesome top 3, but Hamburg will need to bolster their
depth if they want to stay in the top 10 of this always improving district.
Hamburg didn’t even have 5 finishers in 2015, but emerged as a top 10 team last
year. Can they keep the magic going?
Oley Valley
Elijah
Velazquez, Sr 17:35
TJ
Augustine, Sr 17:58/11:18
Liam
Savarese, Sr 18:05
Nick Hartz,
Sr 18:40
Raphael
Forsyth, Sr 19:37
Mason
Shirey, So 19:49
Vince Ferrizzi, So 4:48/19:28
Schuylkill Valley
Ben
Reisenweaver, Sr: 1:59/4:35/16:55
Kyle
Livinghouse, Sr: 4:44/18:15
Graham
Haupt, So: 19:12
Delanie
Heck-Hoppes, Sr: 17:32
Lucas
Horrell, Sr: 18:11
Connor Boreky, So: 11:49
There’s
a nice group of teams with strong returners. Oley Valley and Schuylkill Valley
were two of the top groups last year but there is also ELCO, East Pennsboro and
Fleetwood. East Pennsboro has been
strong before and has a breakout candidate in Caeden Smith (4:40/10:06).
Personally, I really like Fleetwood as a sleeper. They’ve got a nice group of
returners, had excellent track results from Jalloh, Strong and Collinge and have,
at least on the individual side, had success before with medalist Carl Fortna.
Ultimately,
I think last year was a bit of a down year for AA in District 3. It was
certainly a strong district, but I suspect it will be quite a bit better in
2017 relative to the rest of the state. That’s going to make it tough for any
team to contend unless they are peaking at the right time with no weak links.
Let’s see which teams rise to this challenge.
A
Camp Hill (2016: 1st,
2015: 1st)
Matt
Little, Sr: 17:57 (8)
Gus
Latorre, Sr: 18:58 (17)
Weston
Kemble, Jr: 19:30 (28), 11:00
Thomas
Ickowski, So: 19:41 (31), 19:36
Camp
Hill has been the power of A for some time now, even grabbing a state title in
2015. This might be the year they fall from their perch atop the district.
Although they return a nice group, they did lose Dan Shank and Ian Gabig just one
year after losing Blake Behney and Cooper Leslie. Those are four high quality
stars that don’t just grow on trees. Matt Little, an experienced champion in
his own right, will step into the leadership role and look to bring along the
crop of newcomers to Camp Hill’s high standards of excellence.
Tulephocken (2016: 2nd,
2015: 2nd)
Jacob
Cox, Sr: 18:22 (11), 17:28/10:15
Patrick
Strahan, Jr: 19:20 (22)
John
Cox, Sr: 19:22 (23), 19:09
Phillip
Rodig, Jr: 19:44 (32)
Christopher
Ackerman, Jr: 20:26 (39), 20:15
Josh Straw, So 19:53
Tulephocken
has been second to Camp Hill each of the past two seasons and is likely hungry
for some revenge. Jacob Cox is back to lead the charge, coming off a nice track
season. After that, there’s a nice pack, but Tulephocken will likely need at
least one of their runners to step up and become a low 18 minute performer if
they want to grab the district title away from their rivals.
Delone Catholic (2016: 3rd,
2015: 3rd)
Adler
Brininger, So: 17:50 (5), 10:38
Gabe
Hall, Jr: 18:44 (14), 18:11
Shamus
Keefe, Sr: 18:49 (15)
Josh
Hall, Sr: 19:35 (29), 19:11
Charlie
Hoerl, Sr: 19:35 (30)
Connor
Phillips, Sr: 20:56 (41), 20:48
Joseph
Flake, Sr: 21:11 (43)
Delone
Catholic brings back everyone from their 3rd place team including
breakout freshman star Adler Brininger. Delone Catholic was actually in
position to grab a state qualifying spot at mile 2 of last year’s district
championships, but faded a bit down the stretch. This year, I think the
relatively young core of Delone Catholic will be ready for the challenges of the
final mile and maybe even ready for a district title.
Kutztown (2016: 4th,
2015: 5th)
Michael
Hill, Jr: 18:49 (16), 4:50/18:40
Sam
Arnold, Sr: 19:08 (18), 19:02
Matt
Angstadt, Sr: 19:09 (19), 18:02
Derek
Hanna, So: 19:14 (20), 11:15/18:53
Zach
Schell, Sr: 19:26 (27)
Alex
Lanyi, Sr: 20:15 (38), 20:08
Kutztown
is a dangerous team as well, returning their entire top 5 and 6 of their top 7.
They had just a 37 second spread last year, easily the best in the field.
However, that spread isn’t as powerful without a front runner to pull the back
ahead. Michael Hill will be tasked with that job, looking to improve on a
strong sophomore season. Also watch for Derek Hanna as a potential breakout
performer. He will be a sophomore this fall.
York Catholic (2016: 5th,
2015: 4th)
Evan
Schlosser, Sr: 17:26 (4), 17:02
Christian
Gervasi, Jr: 17:56 (7)
Peter
Zelis, Jr: 19:23 (24)
Luke
Motter, Jr: 19:51 (34)
Ryan
Corbitt, Jr: 20:04 (36), 19:46
I think
Evan Scholosser has a chance to give this team an excellent low stick. He has
run 17:02 and is an early favorite for a top 2 finish in the district.
Christian Gervasi has also been a consistent, clutch performer in his first two
seasons at York. The question becomes, what depth will this squad have? They
return their pieces (mostly sophomores last year), but have only had 5 guys
finish the course each of the past two seasons. That puts a lot of pressure on
this group to have no weak links. If they can overcome that obstacle and all
peak at the right time, they will have just as good a chance as anyone to
qualify for states.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)