Meet of Champions: Initital Invites


The First Ever Mock Meet of Champions

22 Teams + 70 Individuals = 224 Total Runners

 

Date: November 15th, 2014

Location: Big Spring High School

Timing System: Run High

 

Note: Unfortunately, this is not technically possible this year because the Mideast Regional Championships are being held at Big Spring, but I like the idea of the meet being here so let’s jut pretend.

 

This is an invite only meet, meaning that if a team does not want to compete, it can decline the invitation and open up another spot for another team. Because the invitations come out on the Monday after the state meet, there should be sufficient time for both a first and second round of invitations.

 

Initial Invites Criteria: Team

Note: Once a team has qualified under one criteria, they are disqualified for consideration under the next. For example, if the District 7 champion and runner-up are both Top 4 Teams in AAA (criteria one), the third place finisher at District 7 is invited to the MoC (under criteria two).

 

1. Top 4 States AAA Team, Top 3 AA Team, Top 2 A Team (9 Teams)

2. Best Team @ 1, 3, and 7 AAA and Independent League Champions (13 Teams)

3. Best Team @ PreStates (best average time all divisions), Paul Short (Brown Race), and Carlisle (Challenge Race) (16 Teams)

4. 6 Wild Cards

 

Note: At the discretion of the committee, Criteria 3 may not be invoked in 2014 because there had not been prior documentation that these meets would be qualifying meets. The qualifying meets may be changed in future seasons, but the committee must announce any changes by March 1st.

 

Wild Cards will be selected based on a number of factors.

1. Team Finish in the most important three meets of the season, i.e. States/Independents, Districts, Leagues

2. Wins against Pre Qualified teams at major invitationals to include, but not limited to, States/Independents, Districts, Leagues, Carlisle, PreStates, Paul Short etc.

3. Discretion of the committee, considering factors including, but not limited to, momentum, previous injuries, unfortunate circumstances at inopportune times, potential and talent

 

In extreme circumstances where the committee cannot come to an agreement on teams, they may choose to add up to two extra wild card entrants. The field will have an absolute cap of 24 teams.

 

Initial Invites Criteria: Individuals

1. Non-Team Qualifiers in Top 25 AAA, Top 20 AA, Top 15 A, Top 10 Independent (Max of 70)

2. Wild Cards to fill field

 

Again, Wild Cards will be selected on a number of factors, similar to those listed for teams. The absolute cap on the number of individuals is 70.

 

If you have any questions please direct them to committee chair Jarrett Felix at jarrettfelix1130@gmail.com or at www.therealtrain.blogspot.com.

 

 

Team Invites for the 1st Meet of Champions

 

Criteria One Qualified Teams:

1. North Allegheny (AAA 1st Place)

2. York Suburban (AA 1st Place)

3. Winchester Thurston (A 1st Place)

4. Conestoga (AAA 2nd Place)

5. Grove City (AA 2nd Place)

6. Sewickley Academy (A 2nd Place)

7. Cardinal O’Hara (AAA 3rd Place)

8. Scranton Prep (AA 3rd Place)

9. Downingtown West (AAA 4th Place)

 

Criteria Two Qualified Teams:

10. Malvern Prep (Independent League Champs)

11. West Chester Henderson (District One Runner-Ups to #4 Conestoga)

12. Hempfield (District Three Champions)

13. Canon-MacMillan (District Seven Runners Up to #1 North Allegheny)

 

Criteria Three Qualified Teams:

14. Mount Lebanon (3rd PA Team at Pre States behind #7 and #1 qualifiers)

15. Cumberland Valley (2nd at Paul Short behind #10 qualifier)

16. LaSalle College High School (4th PA Team at Carlisle behind #2, #9 and #11 qualifiers)

 

6 Wild Cards

Confirmed Wild Card Invites:

17. Easton (AAA 5th Place at States)

18. Central Bucks West (AAA 6th Place at States)

 

Teams to be selected by fan vote (normally the committee would decide all the teams, but since this is a mock meet for the fans enjoyment, I figured you guys should have a say in who is involved).

 

Nominees for selection:

Carlisle, Central Bucks East, Council Rock North, GFS, Hershey, JP McCaskey, Knoch, Lower Dauphin, Pennsbury, Pottsgrove, Northeast Bradford, North Hills, Red Land, State College, Twin Valley

 

Voters may choose to place votes for up to 4 teams. Voters may choose to vote for a team not listed, but in these special circumstances, must provide evidence to suggest what key performances warrant inclusion.

 

As mentioned in the above criteria, in the event of a team outside of the top 4 vote getters receiving a significant amount of support, the committee may choose to include up to two additional teams.

 

Please make all votes by commenting on this post.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individual Invitations

 

Criteria One Qualifiers

Note some teams that have not officially been invited will have individuals who are included here that may later qualify with their teams. They are denoted with an “*”.

1. Jake Brophy, CB East (1st AAA)*

2. Dominic Hockenbury, Lake Lehman (1st AA)

3. Griffin Molino, South Williamsport (1st A)

4. Sam Ritz, Germantown Academy (1st Independent League)

5. Jack DiCintio, Wyomissing (2nd AA)

6. Sebastian Curtin, Mercyhurst Prep (2nd A)

7. Daniel Green, James Buchanon (3rd AA)

8. Simon Smith, Towanda (4th AA)

9. Nick Dahl, GFS (4th Independent League)*

10. Kyle Shinn, Wyomissing (5th AA)

11. Colten Trimble, South Side (5th A)

12. Gabriel Allgayer, Mercersburg Academy (5th Independent League)

13. Casey Comber, Hatboro Horsham (6th AAA)

14. Sean Hilverding, Waynesburg Central (6th AA)

15. Matt Murray, Dunmore (6th A)

16. Josh Herman, Germantown Academy (6th Independent League)

17. Sam Webb, Pennsbury (7th AAA)*

18. Nathan Morgan, Lakeland (7th AA)

19. Domenic Peretta, Beaver Falls (7th A)

20. Alex Kim, The Haverford School (7th Independent League)

21. Cody DiVecchio, Burgettstown (8th A)

22. Joe Newman, GFS (8th Independent League)*

23. Zach Brehm, Carlisle (9th AAA)*

24. Jack Tidball, Tunkhannock (9th AA)

25. Blake Beheny, Camp Hill (9th A)

26. Grayson Hepp, GFS (9th Independent League)*

27. Will Kachman, Bedford (10th AA)

28. Paul Power, Spring Ford (11th AAA)

29. Kyle Gonoude, Salisbury (11th AA)

30. Noah Curtin, Mercyhurst Prep (11th A)

31. Zach Skolonevich, Quaker Valley (12th AA)

32. Brian Hackman, St. Joesph’s (12th A)

33. Nathan Henderson, JP McCaskey (13th AAA)*

34. Andrew Maxwell, Slippery Rock (13th AA)

35. Julian Degroot-Lutzner, Masterman (13th A)

36. Zach Seiger, Red Land (14th AAA)*

37. Jonathan Condloy, Jim Thorpe (14th AA)

38. Devan Cavanaugh, Coudersport (14th A)

39. Dylan Gearinger, Berwick (15th AA)

40. Phoenix Meyers, Seneca (15th A)

41. Alex Milligan, State College (16th AAA)*

42. Jake Susalla, Plum (17th AAA)

43. Matt Kravitz, North Pocono (17th AA)

44. Jason Heid, Valley View (18th AA)

45. Aiden Demko, Hershey (19th AAA)*

46. Jacob Toczko, Tunkhannock (19th AA)

47. Sean Weidner, Lower Dauphin (20th AAA)*

48. Dan Filler, Gettysburg (20th AA)

49. Brian Arita, Council Rock North (21st AAA)*

50. Mike Kolor, Seneca Valley (23rd AAA)

51. Drew Wilkinson, Red Land (25th AAA)*

 

The committee will add wild card entries to fill the field once the team invitations have been finalized. There will likely be around 20-25 wild cards. Suggestions for these will be considered, but there is no voting system currently in place.

28 comments:

  1. Love all the stuff you do and you deserve some more credit. If you were to right a book I would probably buy it, but my four nominations for wild card are state college crn carlisle and cbe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha second person to suggest a book ... Hmm maybe I will have to start working on one ...

      Delete
  2. ah this is so sick.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kind of a homer/totally biased suggestion here, but I think Aaron Gebhart should definitely be on your list of wild card individuals. He didn't have a good race at states, but you can't deny that he ran tough. Went out in 4:43 with the leaders and just couldn't keep it together. Had a great season overall though. District 3 champ, and had a pretty solid performance at Carlisle too.

    -GBC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I completely agree. He is #1 on my list of guys on that wildcard list. You are not being a homer don't worry haha. Great point, kid is a gamer and will do well at meet of champs (and I can guarantee that because I decide how everyone does at meet of champs ....)

      Delete
    2. I feel like District winners should automatically get a bid. Maybe it hurts competition for guys like the District 8 winner or what not, and it could very well just be easier to put a guy like Gebhart in based on his whole body of work, but just a suggestion I guess.

      Delete
  4. GFS CBE Carlisle State College. This would be amazing. So so amazing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is there a way to petition to the piaa or something? Because this is a very legitamite idea, and isnt there already a poll of coaches or something in the state? Also they could use a system like the kolas calculator (see flotrack.com and their ncaa coverage if you dont know what this is). It is similar to how they determine college football/basketball rankings if I am correct. This would be best because it doesnt allow for any bias of coaches and makes a great balance of subjectivity and objectivity.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I would throw diestelow in the wild cards, he was 9th at district 1 champs.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think this is brilliant Jarrett. I wasn't sure how it was going to look when you first proposed the idea, but looking down the list of names everyone you really wanted to see was getting in.

    My 3 Teams:
    My lock: Central Bucks East: Placed top 5 at Foundation and Briarwood but finished 6th at Districts in a close finish against 4th place finishers at the state meet, Downingtown West. They’ve got the top runner in the state, in my opinion (maybe a challenge from Molino or a bounce back day from Abert), and Sonnor Sands has run well. They’re top 6 guys peaked at Leagues or Districts, which shows that despite the slower days at Lehigh they still were PR’ing instead of going downhill after some solid early meet finishes. They were on the rise and a 1 from Brophy does them big favors in a MOC.

    Council Rock North: I’m not sure what to do with them. They placed 4th at Districts and 9th at States. They really didn’t do anything special for me this season and didn’t peak as well as expected. CBE beat them in every major invitational. With Cumberland Valley, LaSalle, Henderson, CBW, and Easton in the meet, Council Rock North sitting in the 9th spot seems like an obvious choice. Also we’ve got the other 4 qualified teams from District One and North finished 4th. Also they were just 9 points behind 5th place Easton. They moved up from 15th after the first mile and then 11th at the second mile, and finally to 9th. They moved up well after getting out poorly and moved up more than anyone else. I think they get a bid.

    State College: This last spot was really tough. They were 7 seconds behind the average time from their 4th place 2013 team at Districts, but on a fast day at states they just averaged one second behind their 2013 team. They also won Districts quite handily over a pretty solid Altoona area team and they didn’t place at Carlisle (10th) behind teams that I do not have qualifying (JP McCaskey, Parkland, and Red Land), but they finished their seasons better than all of those teams, so they’ve got end of the season momentum , which is what spectators want to see.

    --ForrestCRN

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. State colleges number 2 runner went down in the first 400 meters of the race. If everything had come together better they could've done some serious damage

      Delete
  8. I wanna see Carlisle, State College, CBE, and Red Land

    ReplyDelete
  9. In addition to all of the substantive work you did with this Jarrett, my favorite part is that you specified the meet would be timed by RunHigh. Love it

    ReplyDelete
  10. Carlisle, State College, CBE, Altoona

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think Carlisle CBE and State College should definitely be locks

    ReplyDelete
  12. It seems as though a lot of people are picking Carlisle, and I was wondering the reasoning behind this.
    Carlisle:
    1. Won Spiked Shoe Invitational on a tie. Scored 81 points. Scranton Prep scored 89 and State College scored 90.
    2. They placed 11th at their home invitational (300 points) behind YS(212), WCH(225), DTW(228), LaSalle(230), Red Land(238), Parkland(269), McCaskey(275), CV(277), and State College (299)
    3. Placed 6th at Mid-Penn’s scoring 162 points: Behind CV (75), SC (96), Hershey (105), LD (125), and Red Land (148)
    4. Placed 3rd at Districts in 176 points: behind Hempfield (150) and Cumberland Valley (154), but they did beat TV (179), LD (184), Hershey (229), McCaskey (232), and Red Land (250) – I think this was their best meet of the season by far. They beat out Hershey, LD, and Red Land who had all beaten them on previous occasions.
    5. Placed 14th at States: It’s tough to finish well as a District 3 team and they did beat the District champions Hempfield (16th), but they scored 326 points and placed quite far back of Twin Valley (288) State College (255), and Cumberland Valley (207) and only a few ahead of Hempfield who scored 355.
    If we want to talk about a team coming on strong late in the season I think Twin Valley earns more respect than Carlisle does. They sneak into the state meet just 3 points behind Carlisle and 5 ahead of Lower Dauphin, but they place 12th overall as a team and the second place finishers out of any D3 squad.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Twin Valley, Pennsbury, CRN and GFS

    ReplyDelete
  14. sorry that was supposed to be its own comment, not a reply

    ReplyDelete
  15. CRN, TV, SC, CBE

    - BlueBird

    ReplyDelete
  16. Carlise, State College, Lower Dauphin, Red Land - Geneal

    ReplyDelete
  17. I love the idea, but its too big. If its a race of champions make it a race of champions. Limit it to medalists from piaa and the independent league.. Not a race of champions and a bunch of good but not great teams. Make it mean something.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many of the medalists will want to be done with the season and move on to track. Others will want to focus on regionals and nationals, so sadly this meet would probably not get much attention. However, discussing a mock invitational brings up interesting thoughts on how the season could have ended.

      Delete
  18. Personally think too many of the A runners are in. But great, great idea.

    ReplyDelete
  19. The thing is, we don't even need the PIAA to do this. The people have the power, one person who is strong about this (Jarrett) and is willing to do it, that's all it takes. Plus the teams and individuals wanting to participate.

    ReplyDelete